After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures across Europe, fresh technologies are actually reviving these systems. From lie detection tools analyzed at the edge to a system for validating documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of systems is being employed in asylum applications. This article explores just how these systems have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. That reveals how asylum seekers happen to be transformed into obligated hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and keep up with unforeseen tiny within criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their very own capacity to steer these devices and to follow their right for safety.
It also shows how these kinds of technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They facilitate the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of distributed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering them from getting at the programs of safety. It further states that studies of securitization and victimization should be combined with an insight into the disciplinary her latest blog mechanisms worth mentioning technologies, in which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects who have are self-disciplined by their dependence on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal expertise, the article states that these solutions have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double effect: while they assist to expedite the asylum process, they also make it difficult for refugees to navigate these types of systems. They may be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to bogus decisions of non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their circumstances. Moreover, they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.